New beginnings

On June 29, this blog will be one year old. During the election campaign, I experienced quite a bit of traffic as the Rosie vs Jonathan battle heated up but with the elections over and everyone fed up of politics, those readers have gone and the number of repeat visits – mostly I suspect from Lib Dem activists checking what I had written – reduced.

During the next 10 days, I will be busy preparing to get married and am going to take that time away from the blog to think about how to make it better for readers in future. I want to move it away from being nominally a Horsell blog because there wouldn’t really be enough to write about on a daily basis and now Horsell has The Resident blog, I’d rather contribute to the debate on that site that try to match it here. So a change in name is probably in the offing, which I know is terribly confusing but it’ll hurt me more!

I’d still like to be able to give a view of what’s going on in the Woking democratic process from the perspective I get working quite closely with the Conservative group and association. I think that’s something you probably can’t get elsewhere and could be useful (but not too useful, obviously!). I’d also like to be able to talk, within obvious boundaries, about my experiences as a magistrate because again, that’s something that isn’t necessarily available elsewhere.

As I go through my CIPR course (I got a distinction for my first assessment, by the way!) I’d also like to start talking more about Public Relations as a influential factor in our society and politics and picking  up on instances of bad PR and where it has had a subtle effect. For example the Daily Mail carried a story today about a Piranha being caught in a Kent lake. Not at all tied in to the Piranha 3D movie, released in August, I’m sure.

What I don’t want this blog to become is a commentary on national politics, because there’s a load of other blogs that are better than me at that. You know my position, liberal Tory, finding out what someone thinks of every issue gets tedious unless they’ve anything unique to say. So those are some of the thoughts going round in my head. When I get back after my marital mini-break (we’re not honeymooning until September), they’ll be a redesign using the superb WordPress 3.0 and a re-launch along slightly different lines.

Sun never shines

Within a year of The Sun backing Blair in 1997, the uncomfortable re-alignment of the newspaper was broken by one of the most unedifying headlines of recent times upon the revelation that Peter Mandelson and then Nick Brown were both gay.

As a rather more right-wing than I am now Conservative student, I didn’t give the question “Tell Us Tony: Are We Being Run By A Gay Mafia?” as much consideration as I no doubt should have done but in the furore that followed, the newspaper pledged to bring its attitudes to homosexually into somewhere approaching the 20th century.

Now older, and questionably slightly wiser but certainly more liberal with a small “L”, I note with sadness that people rarely change and newspapers never do. Today, as One Nation Tory notes, the paper is asking its readers the question Should gay people be cabinet ministers? Really.

All of which goes to show that in 12 years the Sun has gone nowhere on this, that Labour’s strategy of legislating to rid ourselves of bigotry is a total sophistry and that it is personal experiences that change values and attitudes. The experience of reading the Sun today is hardly likely to be helpful.

Images of an historic day

We have had our differences but Spiderplant certainly has a knack of being in the right place at the right time. There are some good pics on her site of the events that unfolded today in Whitehall.

As we are now officially coalition partners, I hope that we’ll be able to move forward in the spirit of co-operation and understanding, leaving past spats behind. I’ve even given her a tag of her own.

There’s always one

What a shame that some Lib Dems can’t distinguish the difference between what is politics and what is personal. I was pretty shocked at Spiderplant’s bileous, hateful and defamatory post on me after the elections, it seems that she must have had a very bad night if the only thing that comforts her is me not winning. No-one minds a bit of political banter and heated banter at that; but it is very sad when some people clearly have such a lack of context.

All I’ll say is that as the “nastiest character in Woking”, I spent Thursday evening smiling and laughing – despite a nervewracking count and eventual loss in Horsell West – enjoying the atmosphere and chatting to the police, council officers, the press and politicians of all parties who I have built up relationships with since my first Woking count in 2003 and many of whom I count as friends. She on the other hand spent the night storming about the place with a scowl on her face avoiding eye contact with anyone lacking a yellow rosette.

I find it difficult to identify with her habit of turning a debate personal when she’s is losing an argument, nor her apparent attitude that politics is the most serious thing in the world and opponents are there to be smeared and defamed. Perhaps that’s just me, but I think it’s about building a rapport with people (see above) and I regret that someone like Spiderplant doesn’t see how positive this aspect of the process is. The truth is that you can’t win all the time and that there is always a chance for the other side to have their day – the only thing that remains constant is the people and without them to fall back on, politics is nothing more than squabbling

There are many Lib Dems who see things this way but she’s not one of them. I think that is her misfortune and unlike her, misfortune saddens - rather than comforts – me.

Visit The Resident

The Horsell Residents Association newsletter The Resident is now online in the form of a WordPress blog and I have added the link to the left hand side.

The current editor Sarah Johns took over from me last year and is doing a great job of making the magazine’s format even more attractive, broadening the scope of the news stories and taking it online. There is also a Twitter feed @HorsellResident.

Well worth a visit or a follow.

Inside track on Question Time

I still haven’t had a chance to see Question Time from Woking but Spiderplant, who was lucky enough to get a ticket, has written an interesting account here. Definitely worth a read.

Posted in Other blogs, politics. Tags: , . No Comments »

Wrong about Tom

Tom Miller

I was taken aback to read such a personal attack of Woking’s Labour candidate Tom Miller by Spiderplant88 on her blog the other day. There really isn’t any need for such things and she followed up with another personal post about him soon afterwards. This is clearly what the Lib Dems mean when they insist that it is always they who are the victims of negative campaigning.

I’m not going to link directly to either because as a former journo I know a thing or two about the Defamation Act 1996. Just because things are in the public domain is not a defence to libel and the fact that they haven’t been actioned before with another author offers no protection either. And libel stretches all the way along the line – the author, the publisher, the domain owner and anyone who provides another pathway to the words complained of by linking.

I consider her remarks about Tom defamatory – whether or not they constitute libel is not for me to say. Understandably, Tom is not particularly happy about her comments and that is reflected in his response. I enjoy reading Spiderplant’s blog 99% of the time but for someone who in her About section decries personal attacks, she doesn’t seem averse to dishing them out.

I’ve never met Tom but I have it on good authority that he is an affable guy who’s easy to get on with. From his website, he seems to have a young, energetic and driven approach to his Old Labour politics, which I might not agree with but for which there is no better advocate locally. I don’t think he’ll ever be MP for Woking but my call is that he is politically astute, intelligent and ambitious enough to be an MP for somewhere in 2014. Whatever service he may or may not have given to the Labour Party, he doesn’t deserve the scattergun smear that he’s been dealt.

I couldn’t ever advocate that anyone in Woking voted Labour. Leaving aside the listless leadership and economic mismanagement of Gordon Brown, voting Labour in Surrey doesn’t exempt you from the terrible central government funding deal that the party has foisted on the county. But if you do admire Gordon, if you think he’s a misunderstood genius who’s going to pay off our debt, cut our taxes and transform public services while re-discovering his human touch on May 7, 2010 then from what I can see Tom Miller is as good a Labour candidate to represent that view as you could want.

Ten good things about the BBC

I’ve done two things today. Firstly, following a discussion on Twitter with @PaulTwinn, who took issue with my last posts and comments about Nick Robinson, I’ve added Biased BBC to my blogroll because it is a decent blog that has some insight into the very subtle way BBC bias manifests itself.

I accept totally that people within the organisation don’t detect bias or believe that they are on anything other than the middle ground. I’ve never worked for the BBC, but I do have a Master’s Degree in Journalism and Media Theory, five years in the industry and am studying for a Postgraduate diploma in Public Relations after three years in that industry. So I know how the system works. And it isn’t just me claiming there is bias in the corporationthey admit it themselves.

Anyway, enough of the BBC bashing, I think it’s important to remember that the BBC’s coverage of politics is staffed by many good journalists who are earnestly seeking to present the truth to people in the best way that they can. Taking it a stage further, the BBC is also graced with many very courageous and skilled reporters who risk their lives in war zones and undercover investigations to bring the news into people’s front rooms. It is not without reason that the BBC commands respect across the globe.

I am one of the few people I know who believe that the BBC’s investment in BBC3 and BBC4 and digital technology is money well spent – the corporation cannot afford to rest on its channels complacent in the knowledge the licence fee exempts it from having to make progress. It doesn’t and the BBC has been prepared to make risky decisions to stay with its commercial rivals.

So the second thing I am doing today is enforcing a bit of impartiality upon myself by listing 10 reasons why I am happy to pay a licence fee – even if I believe it could be cheaper!

1) The BBC carries British values and standards throughout the world and will remain the most trusted and respected trans-global broadcaster well into the 21st century. Such regard is not built up for no reason.

2) There exists a tradition of quality wildlife and natural world programming at the BBC that the corporation has maintained and even improved (the Planet Earth series was the best recent example). I hope this will continue even when Sir David Attenborough cannot.

3) The BBC has made a substantial proportion of its back catalogue available to the public first on VHS and then on DVD. Okay, this helps bolster its income but means that people born after Fawlty Towers was originally broadcast are able to enjoy it, along with other classics such as Yes, Minister and The Office.

4) iPlayer – the corporation has displayed a high degree of acumen and foresight by pioneering this technology and making it available on platforms such as Virgin, BT and even the iPhone as it doesn’t require Flash Player.

5) The BBC has one of the most accessed and wide-ranging websites in the UK, not to mention one that is fully customisable and has content from cookery to history. It is certainly a lot better than Sky’s and ITN’s and of the online newspapers, only the Grauniad runs it close.

6) Jeremy Clarkson. It’s fair to say that he is the antithesis of everything that the liberal BBC stands for. It’s not just that he’s there – ITV could have done that – it’s that an organisation with such a loud exponent of its collective political anathema gives him a platform that its instincts tell it should be denied. Long may it continue.  

7) BBC Parliament. Hardly anyone can receive it and of those that can, hardly anyone watches it. But as Sir Humphrey said of Radio 3, the countryside, the opera and the universities “It’s vital to know that they’re there!” Televising parliament was a huge turning point in our political culture and the BBC covers it well. It’s not its fault that no-one’s interested.

8 ) Local radio. In many places, it has been marginalised by commercial competitors but it still serves a small but significant part of the population who if it wasn’t there, would have little or no access to local news. Local radio plays a part in helping communities define themselves.

9) The Reith Lectures, which have been commissioned by the BBC since 1948 and most recently broadcast on Radio 4. The 2008 lectures on China were particularly fascinating – it’s a shame that they are not put out on TV; BBC2 is an obvious home for them.

10) Charitable events, notable Comic Relief and Children in Need. The corporation has helped raise more than £1bn since the 1980s with these two charities and that is something to be very satisfied by. Some may think it’s all got a bit too much but in this case I believe the end justifies the means.

So there we are – ten very good things about the BBC. I don’t oppose it, I don’t want to see it privatised, it has an important place in the nation’s fabric. I accept that it will always be an organisation with a culture that prefers a particular way of presenting things. But I won’t just ignore that fact.

Ken Howard’s new website

Lib Dem councillor for Knaphill South and Hermitage Cllr Ken Howard now has a website of his own. Apart from the usual journalist-politicians ups and downs, Ken and I have always got on pretty well and he’s nothing if not passionate about the environment.

He wrote a particularly good report on light pollution (that I’m sadly not able to find on the WBC website) about two years before it became an issue in the mainsteam media. While I couldn’t possibly recommend a Lib Dem website, it might be worth a glance.

It would be nice to have some other Conservative sites to point to, of course.

Denzil’s bin posting

I haven't got a picture of a Woking bin, this one's from Peterborough

I haven't got a picture of a Woking bin, this one's from Peterborough

I saw Denzil Coulson after the executive in Brewery Road Car Park while I was chatting with the News and Mail’s excellent reporter Beth Woodger. He stopped to make some chat and it was good to exchange words after a few little storms in teacups over blog posts etc. He’s standing as the Lib Dem candidate in North East Hampshire, where he’ll be canvassing the leafy streets of Fleet trying to nab James Arbuthnot’s 12,500 majority away.

You’d have to be pretty optimistic to believe he’ll do it but it takes guts to slog away at the other side’s safe seats and it’s fighters like Denzil who keep politics interesting. While I wouldn’t like to think we’ll lose a seat like North East Hants, I’m sure Denzil will give a good account of himself and I’m pleased he’s standing for Goldsworth West again – we might not agree on much but he’s strong member and the council needs that on all sides.

Following our discussion, he walked off and looking at his website for the first time since the Queen’s Speech, I now realise why. He’s gone and posted a cheeky little piece about the rise in cost of the green bins for April 2010, claiming that it is about raising money rather than keeping the environment clean. Well, it’s only going up £2  for most people from £35 to £37, which isn’t exactly extortionate and from £15 to £20 for a second bin.

Denzil’s point is that concessionary charges are going up from £20 to £25 for the first bin and £10 to £15 for the second, which works out at a higher percentage than non-concessions. But obviously if you calculate it in percentage terms, you will get a higher percentage the lower the starting basethat’s just the way numbers work.

I don’t think it’s a big secret that the point of the new scheme is both environmental ie it will help more carbon-efficient collection and prevent 400,000 plastic bags going to landfill and budgetary ie it embraces the principle that residents who use the service should contribute to it rather than the cost being spread to everyone through council tax.

One of the beauties of the new waste scheme is that it introduces a small slice of free market economics into the service. It’s basic pricing theory – if the council charges too much for bins, people simply won’t take up the service and the council will be forced to reduce the price. If however take-up is huge and the council doesn’t test price elasticity at a higher level, it has done taxpayers – including those on lower incomes - a disservice by not attaining Best Value.

So if concessionary households are struggling to find the extra £5 a year, that is something that the market will tell us and I am sure will be examined further.