Rhetorical Questions

Firstly, it’s good to see that Ann-Marie Barker’s nomination as my Lib Dem opponent in Horsell West is now official (unlike her, I am happy to afford my opponent the courtesy of using her name!). Richard Sanderson has left big shoes for whoever replaces him to fill and I look forward to a good-tempered if hard-fought final six weeks.

I’m also glad to note that she’s been reading my blog judging by her comments on Community Question Time and I’m delighted to discover that she’s in agreement with me over developing and expanding the Community Question Time into something more meaningful:

The funny thing is a local Conservative [that's me by the way - Simon!] is now suggesting that a quarterly or twice yearly event that moves around the borough would be a good idea. It’s a great idea and one that was put in place under the theme ‘Tune In’ through a local Liberal Democrat initiative.

Let’s make one thing clear – Tune In was never given a budget to do anything. So its travelling around the borough raising residents’ expectations of what might be achieved was a particular exercise in futility and one that as a journalist and then a press officer at a participating local authority I looked upon on in amazement. The only thing that Tune In was able to do was shift money from one budget heading to another and push some things further up the work programme.

The idea that “working in partnership” is the answer to everything needs to be challenged. Partnership working can be a useful tool in some regards but having six different organisations trying to make decisions together is seldom successful. Very rarely do they truly gel as one “partnership” and the individual interests – usually budgetary – almost always prevail. What you need is the right balance between operational matters that are best worked on together with the support of the community and those that really should be left to one organisation and its professionals to deal with.

My idea of a Community Question Time separates the democratic elements of community dialogue and council accountability from the bureaucratic rhetoric of partnerships and any false expectations of delivery. The views of residents should be constantly expressed at every level by members and every single year, voters have the chance to show their feelings at the ballot box. They are entitled to ask the questions in public that will give them the information they need to inform their vote. I believe that few are interested in how well various slices of local government are working together or not – so long as the outcomes are there.

I agree with Ann-Marie that Tune In was meant to be much more but I believe the only way to achieve it is by little steps. The idea of Question Time standing alone is meant to be that first step - it is distinctly not trying to emulate the flawed Tune In model.

Community action

How do we get the improvements we want for the village

How do we get the improvements we want for the village?

I spent around half an hour today speaking to a Horsell activist of another political persuasion who has in the past been successful in getting things done in the village. I won’t name her to prevent embarrassment (although if she visits the site she is more than welcome to post a comment confirming her identity). The reason I’m telling you this is because although it’s something I’ve thought about in the past – and committed to print as editor of The Resident - I wouldn’t want to take all the credit for this post.

We spoke about the responsibility of a community to take action to achieve the things it wants to get done rather than relying on the local authority to provide it to them. It’s not always a popular messagewhat on earth do we pay our council tax for, I hear you reply – but the truth is that if people have a vision for how their area should look, what services they want to see there and how these should be delivered, it is in these times up to them to do something about it.

I wrote in the The Resident that government would likely become ever more remote as councils merge and powers pass higher up the chain. I said that communities like Horsell would be left to take responsibility for their own care organisations, village facilities and for creating their own visions of the future. It was the latter point that we particularly spoke about today, especially in light of the Local Development Framework that I have written about before.

Should we simply stand by, answer the council’s consultation and allow the officers of the council, in consultation with the government and our elected members to map out our village’s future for us? Or should we rather create our own vision for what we want and task our councillors with fighting in council for that vision, regardless of convention perameters? And whose vision should it be – is it possible for Horsell residents to agree on enough to have a single vision of what we want our community to be?

We are blessed with good schools and shops in Horsell, as well as effectively our own town centre car park in Brewery Road. We also have a myriad of superb organisations from Scouts and Guides to allotments and amateur drama – all run and organised by generous, dynamic and selfless volunteers.

It’s not a question to which I have an answer but here is the heart of it – just how far are we personally prepared to go to make Horsell what we want it to be? It is often only when authorities are seen to make a mess of things that people begin to ask themselves that question and find a favourable answer. How much more could we achieve by asking it of ourselves on our own terms?

End of the road

Unfortunately, the Chobham Shuttle Bus, whose representatives came to address the Horsell Residents’ Association on Wednesday last week, is to terminate at the end of the month.

The group hasn’t been able to find sufficient funding to give us a chance to extend the service into Horsell to bolster up the no 73 route. I was a little surprised to find this out given that although the need for finances was a topic of discussion on Wednesday, the prospect of imminent closure wasn’t mentioned.

Yet on Friday it appears that that was the decision taken. It’s a great shame for people in Chobham and also that we won’t get a chance to look at a new service for people in Horsell.