Free to get on with it

Last laugh - The commission spent money countering his activities but is now being cut to size

When the Audit Commission was first envisaged and created in 1982, it fulfilled an important role in centralising and standardising the audit procedures of local and national government bodies. It is, in effect, the public spending watchdog – and as such it carries a great amount of goodwill among the public. It was the Audit Commission that uncovered the fact that between 1987 and 1989 council houses in Westminster were being sold at knock-down prices to potential Tory voters and forced Dame Shirley Porter to cough up £12million in payback to the council.

But since these days of simple auditing, the commission has been given far more wide-ranging powers to assess local authorities based on politically correct criteria that are part of the problem rather than the solution and meaningless targets that often detract from more fruitful work. The commission also requires councils to create its own silly targets – when I was at Surrey Heath Borough Council, I was forced to come up with a contrived way of measuring our media coverage for positive and negative balance in an attempt to find something to assess ourselves against. It wasn’t totally useless or harmful – but it was pretty irrelevant to most people in Surrey Heath and took time and effort away from other things.

Thankfully, Eric Pickles has announced a couple of good things about the Audit Commission in recent days – firstly that the new head of the agency won’t receive £240,000 a year. As far as I’m concerned, no-one in government should earn more than £150,000 – not because I’m a raving socialist but because very few public sector jobs are worth more than that (especially when taking into account other perks) and also because over-egged public sector salaries contribute to wage inflation in the private and public sectors, which ultimately costs the taxpayer money.

Secondly, the new Secretary of State has said that the over-engineered and painstaking Comprehensive Area Assessments will be scrapped forthwith. We don’t know what, if anything, will replace them but the hope has to be that the answer to that question will be “not much”. The Audit Commission exists to ensure that the Shirley Porters of this world aren’t allowed to get away with defrauding the taxpayer and that is a role that it should continue in earnest. But aside from that, local authorities should be entirely free to get on with running their communities in the way that they want to. If the public don’t like how they are doing it or want it done a different way, they have their say at the ballot box – that’s how democracy should work.

Under Labour it was the government, not the people, who dictated to councils how their areas should be run. No more – and that is a reason to be considerably happier today than this time last year.

PS I also ought to mention that Mr Pickles blocked the plans for Norwich’s unitary status within days of appointment. That’s fine – local people didn’t want it - but he does have to address the question of how the mish-mash of district, unitary, metropolitan and county councils in England and Wales can somehow be standardised. It simply doesn’t make sense to have so many different types of authorities.

Lib Dems all in a Pickles

There’s a strange inconsistency about the Lib Dem conference this time, not least in Chris Huhne – who for a member of the Association of Liberal Democrat Trade Unionists and the owner of no fewer than seven houses, seems remarkably keen to point out inconsistancies in others.

He has produced figures from the Home Office (that well-known Tory-supporting institution) that shows that between 1979 and 1997, crime rose by 81%. Now I understand why he used to write leaders for the Grauniad.

These figures ignore population increases and the fact that the Conservatives had to lead 1980s Britain through a period of considerable social and economic change. Anyone who has seen those iffy election graphs in Lib Dem Focus leaflets will know how well the party deals with statistics. Next Huhne will want to compare these figures with those from the last Liberal government of 1906-22 while completely ignoring the social upheavals that went on during that time.

The Lib Dem conference generally has been less a rallying cry for the faithful, less even a sensible policy debate and more of a constant headline-grabbing exercise – from the savage cuts to conman Cameron, from the mansion tax to this party of crime junk.

I think the truth is nearer this. Nick Clegg’s messages – surprisingly - are mixed and confused and the Lib Dems’ seemingly insatiable need to be all things to all people will unravel unless the party understands where it is positioning itself.

Eric Pickles: trying to nick Lib Dem votersDC has been backward about coming forward with policies and criticised for it – but that is not the same thing. While there isn’t much out there at the moment, make no mistake – the Conservatives know exactly what they are going to do in 2010 and how to pitch it.

But Nick Clegg, at the moment, is not quite there. That, I think is why Eric Pickles senses that some Lib Dems on the right of the party are there for the taking and why the Lib Dems have spent the entire conference trying to put clear water between themselves and the Conservatives through big headlines.

Whether or not many Lib Dems will go to the Tories I’m not sure. But if Pickles’s intention was to put the wind up the Lib Dems and get them in a spin, I think he has at least partially succeeded.