Raising the Rose

Cannon from the Mary Rose

Cannon from the Mary Rose

I struggle to understand how something as important The Mary Rose is housed in an exhibition only big enough to hold six percent of the artefacts that were brought to the surface with it. It’s depressing because it wouldn’t happen in the United States – where warships from only 30 years ago are kept as floating museums, nor in other parts of the UK that understand better the real function of national identity.

Identity is not a basis for nationalism – it isn’t a reason to think that you are better than everyone else. It is not a celebration of discredited moral values and practices nor an advertisement to return to them. Nor is it the quasi-worship of historical artefacts or the unhealthy focus on a particular part or event of history for the sake of nostalgia.

It is a self-awareness based on the narrative of history shored up by the tangible and concrete. It is the appreciation of context and an understanding of the relationship between the past, present and the people. It is not necessarily concerned with the futurethat is the nation’s to decide.

My concern is not necessarily that the Mary Rose artefacts are largely hidden from view. It is the attitude within government that belies this; that English history – and the British history that frames it – is not important enough to warrant investment and the message that sends to people young and old.

We need to feed the vacuum of the English identity with positive and interesting stories. If we don’t, we hand the advantage to those who would define Englishness in an entirely different way.

Update 12/10: I’ve just watched the Newsnight edition with the focus on the emerging English Defence League. It is precisely these kinds of people who will fill a void if we are not prepared to invest in our heritage. Heritage shouldn’t be about large country houses and lofty art collections, it should be about the lives of ordinary people as our ancestors lived them. In Tudor Britain, people were farmers, labourers or craftsmen or else they were retained military personnel.

The records that survive are largely written by clergy, lawmakers or nobility and don’t paint a balanced picture of life. The Mary Rose artefacts can be a small part of cutting through this barrier.

Digging up our identity

Part of the Staffordshire treasure

Part of the Staffordshire treasure

When I was seven years old, I learned in school about the Sutton Hoo treasure, which was found in 1939 in Suffolk under confusing circumstances complicated by impending war. It fired my imagination about history and turned me into someone who became an avid watcher of archaeological documentaries and Time Team.

So I find it exciting when objects that are many hundreds of years old see the light of day and add to our knowledge of who we are, where we have come from and how our future might develop.

The news that a large stash of Anglo-Saxon gold has been discovered in Staffordshire is of particular interest politically as well. It will be crucial where this treasure ends up.

We talk so much about the English identity – or lack of it – and how the Scottish, Welsh and Irish seem to be more at ease with theirs. That’s partly because obsessive left-wing academics and media force us every time we talk about “heritage” and “identity” to re-visit things like the Empire, crusadesreligious persecution and any other historical self-flagellation they can think of.

But the true English identity is no better encapsulated than in beautiful pre-Norman Anglo-Saxon treasure and we should all be able to understand these people, their lives and how they became us – because if you are the English majority, they are you.

Don’t get me wrong – I support and encourage the cultural diversity of the nation along with the most impeccable Guardianista. It’s something I’ve grown up with. But if we are to preserve tolerance of this diversity we must also make the case for the English identity and the value of the Staffordshire treasure is not the amount it will fetch at auction but how it can be a positive aesthetic and tangible objectification of where England came from.

Let us hope then that it doesn’t end up in the US or Middle East but is bought by the nation for the purpose of strengthening the nation.

Repeat offenders

Releasing “news” time and time again is not something that is unheard of with the Labour government and it seems that even the BBC is not trying to hide it for them anymore.

We heard today (well, actually it was leaked to the NoW yesterday) from the Home Office that a brilliant “new” scheme of gaining citizenship was going to be pioneered, with points awarded for good behaviour until pop – the passport’s in the post.

But we’ve also heard it before, as a quick glance in the See Also column on the right hand side of the story shows. First in June 2007 for goodness’ sake and then again in January this year as Brown’s desperation mounted.

This is not new – instead of peddling the press release to the public once again, the BBC ought to be pressing on why something mooted two years ago is no further to delivery. Especially if they can’t bothered to spare the government’s re-spinning blushes anyway.