Wobbling over Wolsey

The purchase of Wolsey Place has attracted a lot of debate in various places, including local Lib Dem blogs and a dismal Facebook group set up by UKIPpers, who have taken a break from blaming everything on Europe.

I’m disappointed that having agreed to it in council, some Lib Dems in Horsell are trying the old “we don’t have to follow the party line” gag just as they did over county hall. No – you don’t have to follow the party line on a Horsell issue such as development in the village or bus service cuts. But this is nothing to do with Horsell specifically and it’s a major financial commitment that the council has signed up to on a cross-party basis. For local activists to now try and wriggle out of their party’s official position on Wolsey Place is opportunistic and disingenuous. If they were so concerned, did they lobby their leadership against cross-party agreement?

For what it’s worth, Horsell West councillor Tony Branagan voted against the purchase but now the matter has been resolved he is committed to defending the council’s position, even though it wasn’t his own. How very easy to abdicate responsibility in the face of hard questions – to me, elected representatives need more fibre than that and Tony has it in spades.

I’d prefer a world where Woking Borough Council was debt-free, as it was six years ago under Jim Armitage. But that isn’t the council we’ve got and only a firesale would restore that position. In the circumstances, the best place to spend the borrowed money is on appreciating assets and generating revenue. So let’s look at Wasteful Woking and see just how inaccurate the UKIP information is.

“Not only do they splash out 68M for Wolsey, they also just announced a 2.5% council tax increase. It’s time to take some control back!”

And just think how much more your council tax would be without £1.5m in revenues next year from Wolsey Place. This is a totally misplaced statement based on the notion that Woking Borough Council itself has written a cheque for £68m.

“It will take the council 50 years to pay back the loan for Wolsey Place, a development that will probably be beyond it’s usab…le life within 20 years. That means a major capital expenditure to either rebuild or upgrade the current site. “Invest to save” is a phrase usually best applied to upgrade work or repairs that will lower future bill and fixed cost base. Not buying a leaky old shopping centre and half occupied office.”

What is wrong with taking 50 years to pay back the loan? People with mortgages usually pay them back over half that and they usually borrow a good deal less than half the money. As time goes on, the value of the repayments will decrease while the rental income keeps pace with inflation ie the value of income over repayments will increase hugely over 50 years. If the centre is sold on, the loan could be paid back or if the site is sold in say 15 years, it will be most likely be worth a great deal more than was paid for it and will cover substantially the amount of the loan outstanding.

Whatever the author’s view of the shopping centre, actually looking at the books (rather than guessing wildly) revealed a sound basis for buying. In addition, there is potential for development in the future, although that’s not something I think would be considered for some time. For the record, floors one to five of Export House are empty, with six to 15 occupied. The internal decor and facilities are very good and I know that because I work on the 14th floor.

Elsewhere, we’ve had concerns about maintenance, unforeseen legislation and all sorts of other things that really scrape the barrel. There are always risks associated with everything – given all the information available, councillors on all sides took the view that this was worth doing.

Finally, there are Lib Dem concerns about the process, about the fact that the deal was done with press and public excluded (Part II). I’m no fan of Part II and as a journalist I fought tooth and nail to find out what was going on “behind closed doors”. But consider this – councillors are elected by the people to take decisions. As residents, we’d no doubt prefer everything to be decided in public but just because the press and public are excluded doesn’t make the process less democratic. These are still the same councillors making the same decisions under the same constitution in the same way that magistrates confer in private rather than open court. And the Lib Dems, who have to a person all been involved in Part II items in the past, know that perfectly well.

In his blog Denzil Coulson claims that the Lib Dems have helped rescue us from a financial disaster this year by backing Wolsey Place. If that makes him happy, so be it - but he is right that the financial outlook for 2010/11 is a lot better because of this purchase. Remember that net of repayments, net of tax, net of maintenance the council will get £1.5m a year from the Wolsey Place purchase – it pays for itself and a lot more besides.

So t’s time that UKIPpers stopped spreading rubbish about the deal that was done for pure electoral gain and that Lib Dems locally had the bottle to agree – as Denzil seems to want to say – that this deal was the very best of the bad job that Woking’s borrowing is.

Parking debate gets charged

It’s not often that Woking Borough Council considers petitions – there are only a couple each year. One of the more outlandishly ridiculous is going in front of the Executive on Thursday.

“WOKING COUNCIL PUTS TOWN CENTRE SHOPS AT RISK. That’s right, the recent increase in car parking charges means that we are now paying the same as the county town of Kingston and more than neighbours Guildford.

“As a result footfall is down considerably, businesses are suffering and many jobs are at risk. Please help to stop this madness now by signing our petition to reduce Woking’s car parking rates to a sensible level and help breathe some life back into our town centre.”

The author of the petition – who for some reason is allowed to remain anonymous in the council report – is from the Sony shop in Wolsey Place. His original idea was to place the Woking Borough Council logo on the petition, which made it look official when it wasn’t. If we ignore this and the various inaccuracies in the petition (eg Guildford is the County Town not Kingston and parking charges in Guildford are comparable at 90p per hour, charged per hour rather than half-hour) then we can look past the hyperbole and bluster to the real cause of the problem.

We are in the middle of the worst recession since the war. Research shows that more people are saving money rather than spending it. There are fewer people buying and using a car. Okay, so no-one likes increases in car parking charges. But does the petitioner not think that reduced footfall in Woking might not be more affected by the economic downturn?

And futhermore, does he not realise that his stupidly overpriced electonics, which in my view differ very little in quality to cheaper Korean and other Japanese brands, are not really the thing that people want to buy in this climate? And what has he done in order to attract shoppers into his store? The fact is that car parking charges are nothing to do with Sony not being able to shift more £1,000 tellies in Wolsey Place Shopping Centre. In my view, it’s the wrong shop in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The council has invested a great deal of money into the town centre to keep it developing. We now have an improved Next store with Cargo going into the old Next unit and there are further negotiations ongoing with another top retail name. To say that the council is killing the town is just nonsense. This petition needs to take the plank out of its own eye before removing the speck from the council’s.

Update 15/10: At the meeting, the executive decided to commit to a £3 all-day rate on Sunday, which should start to take effect in mid-November, although it’ll start even earlier if the Liberal Democrats can agree not to call it in. My own view is that this will have little impact on Sony’s ability to shift their Bravia TVs and £300 digital cameras because people willing to pay that much won’t care about £5 on parking. But the petitioner claimed he was speaking for all businesses who wanted to see increased footfall, expecially on Sunday.

Let’s hope his analysis, which has brought forward an idea already being considered by the executive, was correct.